CALL US AT (636) 916-3300
- OR HAVE US CALL YOU -
   
  • An Image Slideshow
  • An Image Slideshow
  • An Image Slideshow
  • An Image Slideshow
  • An Image Slideshow
  • An Image Slideshow
 
Missouri Omnibus Nursing Home Act provides protection to residents and employees

The Missouri Omnibus Nursing Home Act was enacted as a response to public concerns about the adequacy of state laws, regulation and oversight of the nursing home industry. 

Read more...
 
Who Protects the Patients?

The Missouri Board of Healing Arts falls short.

Read more...
 
Tort Reform Legislation is Unconsitutional
Read more...
 
Expert Witnesses

The Doctors’ Fraternity

Read more...
 
Medical Malpractice Statute of Limitations

Doctors and Hospitals Enjoy Shortened Statute of Limitations

Read more...
 
Tort Reform

Medical Malpractice Litigation Dramatically Reduced

Read more...
 
Collateral Source Rule

No Evidence of Insurance Allowed in Missouri Courts

Read more...
 
A Word About Auto Insurance

What you may not know about auto insurance

Read more...
 

No Evidence of Insurance Allowed in Missouri Courts

Pursuant to the Missouri Rules of Evidence, a Plaintiff at trial cannot produce any evidence or even so much as a suggestion that the Defendant is insured by an insurance company.  Thus, although there may be hundreds of thousands of dollars or even millions of dollars available in insurance coverage, the jury may not hear any evidence of that sort - - if the Plaintiff does produce or even utters the word “insurance” during the trial, (or if his counsel does so) it is highly likely that a trial judge will declare a mistrial and discharge the jury.  It has been held by the Missouri Court of Appeals that it is reversible error for the trial court to fail to declare a mistrial in the face of such evidence being put before a jury.  The result:  Plaintiffs must not only prove their case, but they must overcome the sympathies that a jury may have to a Defendant who it assumes, because there hasn’t been any evidence of insurance presented to the jury, is uninsured against the claim.  Thus, the jury is misled by this process to believe that the Defendant will have to come up with the money to pay the judgment out of his own pocket when that is clearly not the case in the vast majority of cases, i.e., where insurance coverage insures the Defendant against the potential loss of a personal injury case.